During a week when people are talking about the recent accidents
in Bangladesh, and
what that means for companies sourcing from the developing world, I have been
thinking about another subject that has great social impact potential, Corporate
Social Responsibility (CSR). CSR in the US came of age in the 90s when
companies like Nike and the Gap were called out for using supply chains that
had questionable sources, including sweatshops. Companies began to focus more
on improving the image of their social impact, and CSR was one way they have
tried to do that.
I am not saying that companies should ditch their CSR programs or all convert to social enterprise. But companies should try to contribute where they can make the greatest impact. Everyone has seen the CSR program that has skilled employees packing bags of food to feed the homeless in the local neighborhood. Volunteering at soup kitchens is very important, but if your employees have been able to make your company competitive, why are you focusing your CSR efforts on something that could be done by an unskilled worker?
CSR comes from well-meaning companies, but is often of
limited impact on society. Sure, you can recruit star employees who care about
working for a company with “heart,” and customers might view you more favorably
if you can show a social concern. But unless you are a social enterprise that
incorporates social impact into your business model, your CSR program is probably
not making the most of your company’s potential impact.
I am not saying that companies should ditch their CSR programs or all convert to social enterprise. But companies should try to contribute where they can make the greatest impact. Everyone has seen the CSR program that has skilled employees packing bags of food to feed the homeless in the local neighborhood. Volunteering at soup kitchens is very important, but if your employees have been able to make your company competitive, why are you focusing your CSR efforts on something that could be done by an unskilled worker?
What’s your company good at? When companies talk about CSR, they
need to focus on their core capabilities. If your company specializes in
telecom, you would be a great candidate for creating mobile education
solutions. If your company is well known for finance, why not help not for
profits develop ways to measure the social ROI of a planned project? Each
industry has its own capabilities, and they all have potential CSR inputs that
could have a far greater social impact if they just focus their efforts based
on what they do well.
But when the social sector and the private sector
collaborate, they often don’t look at these approaches in this way. They should. If you are coming from a social
organization why try to work with the CSR department of a company if you could
integrate with their core activities? For example, USAID has a department that
collaborates with companies on social issues. They will work with CSR teams,
but they have found the longest term impact comes from collaborating with
companies with common needs central to their business plan.
Accenture
has a great program that focuses on what they do best. Their development
partnerships program helps companies targeting emerging markets for growth to
develop the kind of social development projects that are essential to build
traction in these regions. So here’s the logic: Accenture is a renowned leader
in consulting, and they offer consulting services to socially-focused
organizations that need them. Pretty simple right?
Another way to internalize social impact is by focusing on areas
integral to a company’s operation. Usually this comes in the form of supporting
your workers to increase productivity or making a change in your supply chain
that improves profitability but also has a good social and environmental
impact. The IFC worked with Southern African mining companies that realized
that AIDS had a major impact on the productivity of their workforce. By
providing AIDS education to their employees, they were not only having a social
impact, they were also directly impacting the health and productivity of their
workforce. Closer to home, companies that support bike
to work programs or fit workplaces
also impact the health and wellbeing of their employees. When Apple
advocates for marriage equality, they say it is because current laws hurt
recruiting and employee morale in the US. But it also will have a social impact
and will indirectly result in marketing that they have decided is good for
their business.
I am an avid supporter of socially focused business
decisions, and think the world is a better place because of CSR. But let’s make
sure we get the most out of it. If your company is trying to make social
commitments, why not make sure you have maximum impact?
No comments:
Post a Comment